Doublespeak

24 09 2008

I knew something was wrong with this McCain ad, but I just couldn’t place it. Brent Staples, though, explains it perfectly in The New York Times:

In the Old South, black men and women who were competent, confident speakers on matters of importance were termed “disrespectful,” the implication being that all good Negroes bowed, scraped, grinned and deferred to their white betters.

In what is probably a harbinger of things to come, the McCain campaign has already run a commercial that carries a similar intimation, accusing Mr. Obama of being “disrespectful” to Sarah Palin. The argument is muted, but its racial antecedents are very clear.

The thinly veiled racial undertones in this election are hitting some voters loud and clear, even though some may not recognize it. Staples also talks about other members of the GOP are characterizing Obama with antiquated racial signifiers like “uppity” and– maybe even more appallingly– “that boy.”

I’m hoping these instances will be fewer and farther between as we near November 4, but something tells me that the opposite will be true. Meanwhile, in our so-called “post-racial” society, Obama will have to continue to be conciliatory where other candidates might be downright indignant, a throwback to the days where black men had to avert their eyes from a white woman to avoid retaliation.

The way that Republicans have attacked Obama are disgusting, but not surprising. They have placed him in a particular quandary wherein he is ridiculed for being too soft-spoken and passive to be an effective president during this time of war, yet his image is hardened when it’s convenient to characterize him as the bad guy, just like in this modern Willie Horton ad (Daily Kos suggests you watch it without sound for the full effect):

It’s tough to see Obama have to tiptoe around things that candidates don’t typically have to avoid, but if it gets him into the White House, do we have a choice?





A Merck-y Situation, Indeed.

19 09 2008

Given the United States’ murky history of codifying eugenics into law and authorizing controversial studies on underserved populations, you would think that The USCIS would have thought twice about adding a new stipulation to US Citizenship: fully going into effect this past August, the latest measure requires all female residency applicants to be vaccinated for Human papillomavirus, or HPV.

This can be read one of two ways: Either the Bush Administration is placing yet another unfair (not to mention sexist) barrier on immigration by making such an expensive shot mandatory, or it’s an example of savvy pharmaceutical lobbying on Merck’s behalf to both stimulate their bottom line and do more extensive testing on a population that has no choice to opt out. (Merck also lobbied states to give mandatory vaccines to schoolgirls. Virginia now requires all sixth grade girls to be vaccinated, but there is an opt-out clause.)

I find this to be flagrantly abusive on both counts, and I tend to think that a little bit of both motivations affected the decision. At least one CDC doctor disagreed with the decision toward the beginning, on the grounds that HPV shouldn’t be treated as a communicable disease the way, say, meningitis is. There’s no disputing that Gardasil has some very promising effects, but there have also been some severe problems associated with the vaccine. Now that every woman applying for residency in the US has to take the 3-shot series, they have no option but to expose themselves to the risks associated with a drug that they might not have wanted to take in the first place.

Reproductive freedom is something that a lot of women, including myself, take for granted, but it’s something that should be extended to every woman who enters this country. It’s simply not humane to take away that choice in exchange for a chance to live in America. As a woman of color, I am constantly reminded of how little the US cares about black and brown people, and this is just the latest example of a long history of state violations against females who look like me. WOC PhD has more on the legacy of reproductive violations on our bodies, and talks more about why the vaccine is a bigger deal than you might think it is.





No Justice, No Peace

26 04 2008

I get mad at our corrupt, white supremacist hierarchical society so often that I probably sound like a broken record.

No matter how much we rally, protest and march, it never seems to be enough. Is it possible to have a nonviolent revolution in the United States? Sometimes I question if our collective principles are enough to fight this system and the powers that be.

Here we are, the day after the Sean Bell trial and not a whole lot has changed. The three police officers who gunned down Bell, an unarmed man, on his wedding day were acquitted of all charges yesterday by a judge in Queens. After work, I joined a rally outside of the courthouse, followed by a march through Jamaica, right to the site where Bell was murdered. I felt a lot of emotions walking down those streets, yelling to the top of my lungs. I thought the outpour of support from activists from all over the city was something unlike anything I’d felt before. Once we started marching, it was like all the energy and outrage were culminating into a beautiful demonstration against the repeated attacks on our community. I also felt a lot of solidarity with all the Queens community members who honked their horns, yelled out of windows and gathered outside of beauty salons to watch us rally through the streets. There was just something 500 angry people screaming “fuck the police” that got me all fired up inside.

But it also makes me sad that we have to do this. The event itself was a great demonstration in the face of the injustices that were carried out in that courthouse yesterday, but the fact remains that an innocent man was killed, and police officers murder dozens of unarmed black and brown people for no reason every year. These people have become powerful symbols in their communities of the systematic annihilation of people of color, which has brought together hundreds of discussions amongst scholars and activists, and has brought tremendous attention to the problems plaguing corrupt policing and the severe lack of “Professional Standards.”

But why does it happen every day? How many marches and rallies and protests do we have to assemble before we change our own government? Is true revolution in America possible without force? I’m getting more and more skeptical about the principles of nonviolent demonstration as I grow older. The thing that frustrated me the most about the march yesterday was that the police were, in effect, leading it. Even though we were a crowd of hundreds, there were police flanking us on either side, and we were accompanied by miniature police cars in the very front of the march. There were calls to break formation and veer to the side, or even make an about-face to throw the officers off, but ultimately we all respected the organizers of the rally and kept everything peaceful and orderly.

While I understand that they wanted to make sure that nothing got out of hand so that the media couldn’t blow anything out of proportion, there’s also a part of me that thinks a protest is supposed to be raucous and a little out of control. Still, though, on the other hand, the families of the victims don’t need to have their loved one’s memory associated with a bunch of rowdy activists; The time and place for that behavior comes sometimes, but yesterday wasn’t the time. I’m still torn.

It kills me that whenever I decide to bring a child into this world, this is what he or she will be born into. I know now that this world is not kind to people who look like me; and they are even less so if you happen to be born a male. The children at the rally really made me reflect on how I want them to grow up and have more freedom than we do in 2008.

America’s supposed to be free, but for who? When I can take a train from the richest city on the planet 45 minutes into a neighborhood where police were allowed to assassinate a man in cold blood with fifty shots, I ask you, where is the justice?





A: 75 Years

14 04 2008

Q: How far back does this video clip set the Black race?





Buchanan: “Where is the gratitude?”

25 03 2008

via Media Matters:

“[...]America has been the best country on earth for black folks. It was here that 600,000 black people, brought from Africa in slave ships, grew into a community of 40 million, were introduced to Christian salvation, and reached the greatest levels of freedom and prosperity blacks have ever known.”

Yo, Pat B., I am definitely loving the passive voice, effectively taking blame away from the whole slave ship thing. It totally says, “Well, they came over on the slave ships…it’s irrelevant who brought them here in the first place.”

I would post more here, but you really have to read the original to believe it. I’ll post a response later, when I’m not outraged and exhausted.





Fair and Balanced

23 03 2008

The Nation‘s John Nichols follows up on the Obama campaign’s response to Fox News’ Chris Wallace’s comments about his network’s coverage of the Obama/Wright Faux Controversy.

A commenter on Nichols’ post provides the following links, showing that Wright’s comments were, of course, taken out of of context and blown out of proportion by Fox News:

9 Minute “Chickens have come home to roost” video. [YouTube]
Full Audio of Wright’s sermon, with reflections about September 11 victims. [Odeo.com]
“God Damn America”, in context. [YouTube]

Read the rest of this entry »





Cycles of Violence

22 03 2008

When I saw that the topic for the YM Blog-a-thon was violence, I wasn’t sure that I’d be able to actively engage in dialogue. I’ve never been directly affected by the violence that occurred in my neighborhood, which is more of a matter of extreme luck than anything else. I’ve never known anyone my age who was taken away as a result of gang violence, nor do I know anyone who is currently serving in Iraq. I know it sounds ridiculous, but I almost feel underqualified to speak about youth and the violence that constantly goes on around us.

However, last week in his monumental speech about Race in America, Obama said something that resonated through me:

A lack of economic opportunity among black men, and the shame and frustration that came from not being able to provide for one’s family, contributed to the erosion of black families—a problem that welfare policies for many years may have worsened. And the lack of basic services in so many urban black neighborhoods—parks for kids to play in, police walking the beat, regular garbage pick-up and building code enforcement—all helped create a cycle of violence, blight and neglect that continues to haunt us.

As I remember the working class Black community in Chicago where I grew up, I recall the man who was shot down the block after a drug deal gone wrong, doing my homework and hearing fights going on in the street below my bedroom, and the stray bullet that came through my house on New Years’ Eve. The conditions that Obama so elegantly lay out all converge and snowball and even though I was fortunate enough not to experience these things directly, I know they’ve had an effect on the way I perceive the world around me.

I don’t think that the “Cycle of Violence” that Obama mentions is limited to members of the community. Because violence and fear are so racialized– that is, Americans carry their own stereotypes over who is and who isn’t to be feared, largely based on whether or not someone has dark skin– the cycle becomes difficult to break, and police violence becomes more pronounced. At least one study suggests that police insensitivity and lack of accountability are to blame for police brutality and shootings of people of color.

I hate that I live in a world where there is a war waged against people who look like me. Just as violence is racialized, it’s also largely gendered– because Black communities lack the resources and economic opportunities readily available in middle-class White communities, Black males often seek to regain power by nontraditional means. Largely related to the War on Drugs, the War on Black Males has led to increased rates of incarceration, public fear and even lowered life expectancy. The Black man is a dying breed, and the real shame is that the racial dialogue that Obama and the Wright Debacle has opened has been sensationalized as little more than a story about a radical, “neo-Islamist” Pastor scaring White people and pushing for Black Power.

I hate to be naive here, but sometimes I can’t help but wish for sweeping systemic change to come all at once. I know it won’t, but I have trouble imagining a world where I may someday have to struggle with how to raise a Black man while letting him know that the societal cards are stacked against him. How do we help our brothers, and our communities? How do we gain economic independence and provide better opportunities in the places we live? Jeremiah Wright may have said things in a tone of voice too harsh for some people to accept, but we can’t forget the heart of his message, nor should we ignore the painful history lessons that Obama gave in Monday’s speech.





Pigs Fly, Hell Freezes Over

22 03 2008

Fox News Sunday anchor Chris Wallace takes Fox and Friends to task over their portrayal of some of Obama’s comments. (Via Think Progress.)





Election 2008 and the Kitchen Sink

16 03 2008

Anyone who knows me is well aware of the fact that I have been an avid Obama supporter for quite some time, but the most troubling element of this campaign is the absence of a serious dialogue about Race in Modern America. Every time something happens that I think will provoke a stimulating conversation for once, it gets glossed over by both the mainstream media and more progressive media outlets.

The first such incident of course is when Michelle Obama said, “for the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country.” To me, that makes sense: Here is a 44-year-old Black woman who grew up on the South Side of Chicago, who has no doubt been keenly aware of the disparities that have existed between whites and people of color for quite some time. It comes as no shock to me that she would make those comments; I’m well aware that seeing Barack win over America one state at a time is a once-in-a-lifetime experience and I’m only 22 years old. But instead of taking the controversy that ensued after her now-infamous speech as an opportunity to bring to light exactly why those statements resonate throughout communities of color, they were just swept under the rug and treated at face value by both the media and the candidates themselves. If I were in Clinton’s camp, I would certainly urge her to use that media storm to her advantage in order to connect with women of color, a constituency that she consistently ignores.

Another issue with the Obama campaign that should be invoking more interesting conversation and debate is the ideology of his mentor and pastor, Jeremiah Wright. Fox News has been harping on this for a while, and I guess they’ve finally gotten their druthers because outlets like MSNBC and ABC News are starting to make a bigger dealout of it. Basically, Sean Hannity seems to have a personal vendetta against Wright and his followers at Trinity United Church of Christ simply because their Church covenant has a section urging parishioners to support Black businesses. Are you kidding, Hannity? Do you really not understand why a predominantly Black middle-class church on the South Side of Chicago would support such a thing? However, instead of making the logical arguments about how Black business is key to supporting a viable, affordable and non-gentrified community, the MSM seems to just focus on whether or not Obama should retain Wright as a confidante. And instead of challenging the MSM’s ignorant surface analysis of Wright’s comments, Obama seems to be distancing himself from the man who Baptized his children and performed his wedding.

I understand: There certainly is a double standard between Obama and Hillary. While Clinton can proudly boast her status as a Female Candidate, it’s dangerous for Obama to flaunt himself as the Black Candidate. It’s more threatening to Whites in America to hear Obama talk about the Black experience than it is to hear about Hillary being a woman, even though both should be celebrated and brought to the light. So I get it– it’s not necessarily Obama’s fault that he can’t delve deeply into issues of race when they arrive, it’s the American public’s fault. Still, though, I can’t help but wish we lived in a country where we weren’t so constrained by simple minds and simple conversation.





The Politics of Halloween

7 11 2007

Recently I got into an embittered battle with a friend concerning someone’s Halloween costume.

A mutual white acquaintance dressed as a “wigger,” which I found to be completely ridiculous and mad ignorant. The intent of the costume, it’s said, was to “poke fun” at the way white people dress like black people. Other than the term “wigger” being only about a half step removed from the n-word, the costume was about as culturally ignorant as dressing in blackface, and it reminded me of the Straight Thuggin’ party at the University of Chicago that garnered so much media attention. I know this girl did not have malicious intent, but isn’t that always the excuse? My position is that, Halloween or not, cultural sensitivity does not suddenly fly out of the window. As someone who is highly concerned with issues of race and gender, I feel it is my duty and my right to speak out against someone making such egregious errors. Whereas someone can claim ignorance once, it’s desirable to prevent such actions from happening in the future. Education and awareness are key, and I’m totally sensitive to the fact that sometimes white people with no black friends who grow up in white places aren’t exactly as aware as they might be if they were in a different position.

The reason this battle bothered me so much is not because of the matter at hand. It was because I began to see that despite this person being one of my closest friends, there is a chasm that will never be bridged. At many points over the days that this argument boiled on (and on and on), I was brought to tears because of his sheer unwillingness and inability to understand this simple fact: As a white male, who grew up in Iowa, with absolutely no black friends besides myself, he just does not have the same reaction to these things that I do. It’s not a bad thing, there’s just no basis to see these things in the same context. To him, dressing in blackface and imitating minstrelsy is merely an act of political defiance, or an act of free speech. Ignorant, but understandable, given the circumstances. But to me, it evokes feelings that are very deeply connected to my past, my present and my future. My family lived through race riots in Chicago after King’s assassination. My great-grandparents were share croppers. I’ve been called a “nigger.” So for someone without those experiences to tell me that I don’t have the right to be upset about something as seemingly inoffensive as a Halloween costume takes away my agency as a human being. There’s nothing worse than being told that what you think does not matter, except maybe if it’s a so-called friend who keeps saying it.

The most perplexing part of this is that this man purported to be advocating freedom of speech by chastising me for exercising mine. I never told anyone that they couldn’t dress as anything for Halloween– I merely wanted to raise awareness to the issue and make sure that if the person wasn’t aware of what they were doing, that they would be in the future. But to be repeatedly bludgeoned by the First Amendment is missing the point. Doesn’t that mean that I shouldn’t be persecuted for feeling the way I did?

Look, this isn’t about Halloween costumes. It’s about the fact that this man, with whom I thought I shared a very special bond, pretty much ruined our friendship by going on a pointless self-righteous tirade with no logical purpose, even when I repeatedly pleaded with him to stop. I felt violated every time I was accused of hating free speech, or every time I was told I was wrong for having my beliefs. Weirdly enough, the same pig-headed tactics of flaunting the Constitution and denial of personal freedom are used by the American Government to get their way. Hmmm. Interesting.

But what I got most out of this is something I’ve been told I’d eventually figure out: There’s no way in hell that I can ever seriously date a white man again. They’ll never share the same beliefs as I do, which isn’t normally bad, but I don’t think I could handle the emotional fallout of such an argument again. I guess I can’t explain it, really, but it’s worse than disputes about normal things that happen in a relationship because there’s just absolutely no way that the person will see your point of view because they’ve just walked in different shoes for their entire lives. And plus, that whole white man-black woman power dynamic is just something that always kind of simmers in the back of my mind and when things like this happen, I remember the historical implications of such things. This whole ordeal was taxing, but no matter how much I talked to certain friends about it, despite their wonderful intentions, they just could not grasp what I was saying. Except for Tiffany, my best friend, and perhaps one of the only people I know who looks at racial politics on the same level as me. She saw exactly the same things I did, and provided me with the encouragement to stick up for myself.

So, it may not seem like a huge deal. After all, it was just a Halloween costume. And I agree with that: at the end of the day, it’s obviously not as bad as, say hanging a noose on someone’s doorknob. But we need to realize, as a culture, that the things we do are not in a vacuum. You can use the argument that something is happening “just on Halloween” or “just at X College,” but each such incident contributes to a larger issue that needs to be addressed in our country. It contributes to a collective mindset that is dangerous, given our nation’s despicable and oppressive history.